Search Jobs Contact Us Register

Scotland's Bold Stand Against Conversion Therapy

Scotland's’ Government takes a step towards LGBTQ+ equality by taking a stand against conversion therapy.  


The Scottish Government has made a significant move by declaring its commitment to banning conversion therapy. This decision has been widely supported by advocates of human rights and LGBTQ+ communities across Scotland, signalling a societal shift towards greater acceptance and understanding. 


Health Secretary Neil Gray has stated that the Scottish Government is committed to a ban on conversion therapy, describing the legislation as "important." This comes after Dr Hilary Cass told MSPs that clinicians were worried about prosecution if the new law comes in.  


The consultation document released earlier this year by the Scottish Government, proposed a new criminal offence for engaging in conversion practice, whether provided by a healthcare practitioner, family member or religious leader.  


The paper defines conversion practices as where there is “a purpose or intention to change or suppress another individual’s sexual orientation or gender identity.” Any such action would become illegal, one possible punishment being "imprisonment for a term not exceeding seven years."  


The core of this commitment lies in recognizing the detested nature of conversion therapy, defined as any practice intended to alter or suppress an individual's sexual orientation or gender identity. The proposed criminal offence against engaging in such practices sends a clear message that Scotland values its diverse population and will not tolerate harmful attempts to change fundamental aspects of a person's being. 


However, concerns have been raised by clinicians and political parties about the need for precise legislation to avoid unintended consequences that may restrict open dialogue or impact healthcare professionals. 


Dr Cass, the paediatrician who conducted a significant review on the treatment of transgender children, emphasized that while conversion therapy was "completely unacceptable," MSPs should be cautious not to enact legislation that would discourage clinicians from having "appropriate exploratory conversations" or make them "even more anxious potentially about working in this area."  


Gray mentioned that the government was reviewing the responses to the recent consultation and would "reflect upon them." He also confirmed the government's dedication to moving forward with the legislation because it is a crucial piece of legislation. 

As discussions continue, it is important to contextualize this commitment within Scotland's broader political lands


cape, highlighting the need for subtle and robust legislation. This reflects a broader trend in policymaking: navigating complexities to achieve meaningful change without unintended repercussions. 


Scotland's approach to conversion therapy reflects a multifaceted stance, firm in its condemnation yet conscious of its complexities. The way forward involves careful deliberation to uphold equality and dignity while addressing practical concerns.